The coronavirus has managed to do what all the product demos, ad campaigns, and sales pitches couldn't: It's forcing businesses to actually shift their corporate cultures so that people can collaborate and be productive when commuting to the office is no longer an option.
The promise of unified communications -- integrated internet-enabled chat, messaging, voice, and video -- has always been to bridge the gap between knowledge workers, no matter where they are in the world. Cloud-based service providers and platforms give us access to everything people used to need to go to 'the office' for. Work, so the story was told, was what you did, not where you went.
- Of course, you still want the work to be done, but you also want your people to be productive, healthy, and happy. This will now only happen if you release this antiquated notion of.
- Antiquated Notions' Latin Flash Cards have been updated! This brand-new set has been designed to be printed on pre-perforated business card stock and laminated using these business-sized pouches. Download includes instructions for how the cards are organized and how to print them at home. NOTE: There is a download limit for this file.
Antiquated definition is - outmoded or discredited by reason of age: old and no longer useful, popular, or accepted. How to use antiquated in a sentence. Synonym Discussion of antiquated.
The only problem, of course, was culture. Workers -- even at many technology companies that provided these services -- were expected to show up in the office, for the sake of culture. And the idea of hiring people who didn't live near 'the office' was always fraught with concern.
All this comes into sharp focus with the advent of a pandemic like the coronavirus. Now, with whole cities on lockdown in China (and elsewhere), businesses everywhere have to deal with a work reality that not only moves beyond physical location, but makes physical location a real constraint.
What is a CEO to do, with this sudden shift in reality? Here are three big takeaways.
Antiquated Notions Timeline
1. Companies are abandoning 'command and control.'
All this comes into sharp focus with the advent of a pandemic like the coronavirus. Now, with whole cities on lockdown in China (and elsewhere), businesses everywhere have to deal with a work reality that not only moves beyond physical location, but makes physical location a real constraint.
What is a CEO to do, with this sudden shift in reality? Here are three big takeaways.
Antiquated Notions Timeline
1. Companies are abandoning 'command and control.'
Antiquated Notions Latin Flashcards
Do you have a command and control culture, where employees are expected to commute to your office, show up at 9 a.m., and work until quitting time? Good luck. Of course, you still want the work to be done, but you also want your people to be productive, healthy, and happy. This will now only happen if you release this antiquated notion of control. You'll need to institute a very flexible work-from-home policy, and your people need to do their best to keep the workflow up while not in the office. This isn't a technological hurdle in 2020 -- but for many, many companies, it's a significant cultural one.
The simple solution is to work with line management and get them to not just embrace collaboration technology and remote work, but put policies in place that pilot (for beginners) or expand (for the more advanced) the program as if your brand's future depends on it. Because it might.
2. Companies are rethinking the balance between 'the work we do alone' and 'the work we do together'
Collaboration has long been the holy grail of management steering committees, who have collectively failed to figure out productivity by promoting misguided notions like the open office environment. With the ugly dawn of this workspace devolution, workers -- being smart, sentient beings operating in their own self-interest -- adapted by buying their own wireless headsets. All this has uncovered a deeper truth: Knowledge workers overwhelmingly believe that individual productivity -- the work they do alone -- is more important to their success than collaboration is. The work we do alone, in other words, is more important than the work we do together.
With the advent of this newly-forced decentralization of knowledge work, companies must rethink how they design workspaces. Open office spaces may be cheaper than the alternative, but private spaces are better for individual performance. This means more private offices, huddle rooms, pods, whiteboard space, and everything that moves ideas from one person's head to an 'aha!' moment.
3. Companies are reconsidering the skill sets needed for a new generation of management.
With the virus shining a bright light on the shortcomings of everything from corporate cultures to workspace designs to global supply chains, business leaders would be remiss if they didn't also note that how they evaluate management skill sets needs to change, as well. New and old managers alike must be highly capable of leading teams that aren't all in the same location.
Companies now must focus on hiring workers who can manage remote workers -- from hiring and firing to project managing far-flung teams to motivating people who aren't always available for a quick face-to-face meeting. With this in mind, prioritize crisp, clear communication skills more suited to quick calls and text messages. You'll need the ability to evaluate the performance of workers you don't see every day -- not just making sure that they're doing what you hired them to do without goofing off, but also spotting the rare promotion-track talent that doesn't work in headquarters.
It's sobering to think that a pandemic may force you to rethink your corporate culture, but this is a clarion call to embrace what's available for the good of your people. What's possible may have outstripped what's comfortable, but this polarity may have to flip if you're to keep your employees healthy, happy, and productive.
Antiquated Notions Flashcards
Antiquated Notions Definition
When, at his inauguration speech on Jan. Dropbox chrome. 20th President Bush said: 'America speaks anew to the peoples of the world,' he was announcing a new foreign policy for America, which he calls the 'Forward Strategy of Freedom.' Evidently he wants to move America away from the disastrous policy of the past, which was merely a quest for 'stability,' a 'stability' we were never quite able to achieve anyway and which demanded that America betray its own values of freedom and justice by supporting various dictatorships around the world.
The gist of this new policy was outlined when he announced: 'So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.'
This doesn't mean the U.S. plans to invade every tin pot dictator. But I take it to mean that America will no longer uncritically support despots who violate the rights of their citizens and seek our destruction. Pressure to reform will be brought to bear. If this is Mr. Bush's intent then I say: 'It's about time.'
But there is a problem here. While some free nations will happily support the U.S.'s new foreign policy, the rest of the world's nations still base their foreign policy on an antiquated notion of 'sovereignty.'
Judging by all those who cried that the U.S. shouldn't invade a 'sovereign' nation like Iraq, 'sovereignty' must mean the 'right to rule' regardless of whether said 'sovereignty' is earned by free elections or seized and held by force as in Iraq, Iran, North Korea and many others.
The United Nations' charter mandate, chapter 1, article 2, item #1 says:
'The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members.'
Equality of membership rights is a standard benefit of belonging to most any organization. But most organizations don't invite the community's worst criminal elements to be full partner members with equal voting rights and veto power. Such an organization would be ineffective, not to mention immoral. The thugs would do as they please and simply vote down or veto any attempt to discipline them. This is the U.N. today: ineffective and immoral.
The notion that Saddam Hussein has a sovereign right to slaughter hundreds of thousands of his citizens is a political and moral obscenity.
This 'one size fits all' idea of sovereignty has to go. The U.N. needs to adopt a new definition of sovereignty that respects citizens' rights and rejects as illegitimate any sovereignty that violates citizens' rights.
Such a definition might look like this: Sovereignty, the right of a people to govern themselves in which the government's sovereignty is delegated to it by the consent of the governed in whom all sovereignty originates.
I would like to see President Bush give this definition (or something close) to our ambassador to the U.N. with instructions to get the U.N. to adopt it. This is critical, as all nations need to be on the same page. Then and only then will the 'Forward Strategy of Freedom' have an honest chance of success.
Memory Master Cc
When, at his inauguration speech on Jan. 20th President Bush said: 'America speaks anew to the peoples of the world,' he was announcing a new foreign policy for America, which he calls the 'Forward Strategy of Freedom.' Evidently he wants to move America away from the disastrous policy of the past, which was merely a quest for 'stability,' a 'stability' we were never quite able to achieve anyway and which demanded that America betray its own values of freedom and justice by supporting various dictatorships around the world.
The gist of this new policy was outlined when he announced: 'So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.'
This doesn't mean the U.S. plans to invade every tin pot dictator. But I take it to mean that America will no longer uncritically support despots who violate the rights of their citizens and seek our destruction. Pressure to reform will be brought to bear. If this is Mr. Bush's intent then I say: 'It's about time.'
But there is a problem here. While some free nations will happily support the U.S.'s new foreign policy, the rest of the world's nations still base their foreign policy on an antiquated notion of 'sovereignty.'
Judging by all those who cried that the U.S. shouldn't invade a 'sovereign' nation like Iraq, 'sovereignty' must mean the 'right to rule' regardless of whether said 'sovereignty' is earned by free elections or seized and held by force as in Iraq, Iran, North Korea and many others.
The United Nations' charter mandate, chapter 1, article 2, item #1 says:
Antiquated Notions Flashcards
'The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members.'
Equality of membership rights is a standard benefit of belonging to most any organization. But most organizations don't invite the community's worst criminal elements to be full partner members with equal voting rights and veto power. Such an organization would be ineffective, not to mention immoral. The thugs would do as they please and simply vote down or veto any attempt to discipline them. This is the U.N. today: ineffective and immoral.
The notion that Saddam Hussein has a sovereign right to slaughter hundreds of thousands of his citizens is a political and moral obscenity.
This 'one size fits all' idea of sovereignty has to go. The U.N. needs to adopt a new definition of sovereignty that respects citizens' rights and rejects as illegitimate any sovereignty that violates citizens' rights.
Such a definition might look like this: Sovereignty, the right of a people to govern themselves in which the government's sovereignty is delegated to it by the consent of the governed in whom all sovereignty originates.
I would like to see President Bush give this definition (or something close) to our ambassador to the U.N. with instructions to get the U.N. to adopt it. This is critical, as all nations need to be on the same page. Then and only then will the 'Forward Strategy of Freedom' have an honest chance of success.